Skip to main content

Navigating Media Misinformation: The Battle Between Fact and Fake


With the media compromised, people are finding it hard to separate real news from the fake 

It's difficult to separate real news from fake. 

You can no longer rely on TV news shows for the truth. And social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp) have too much misinformation. 

Our broadcasters have become mouthpieces of political parties. The ones, you thought, would hold the government accountable for their actions, have drifted into their arms. Anyone voicing an opinion different from the government is a public enemy. An army of online trolls can discredit anyone who dares to speak out against a state narrative.  

Governments have always wanted to control the media. But India's press has never felt so threatened as it does under the regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Many Media outlets need government's support, thus, are reluctant to take on those in power for the fear of losing business. 

Noted journalist Punya Prasun Bajpai resigned from his position at ABP News because he spoke against the government. Bajpai revealed in detail to The Wire the circumstances of his ouster. One of the reasons he wrote that was he was not suppose to mention Modi's name on his show.  

A few have suffered fighting for the truth but a great many have benefited by denying its existence.

One among them is Republic TV's Arnab Goswami, a pro-establishment anchor and the loudest supporter of Modi. Goswami has gone above and beyond in his praise of Modi, and attacks anyone who questions the government. Republic TV acts at the behest of the government, often spreading the information that helps the people in power. 

Goswami has also been accused of causing communal disharmony. He sought to give a communal twist to the gruesome lynching of three people including two Hindu monks by the mob in Palghar, Maharashtra. The police are investigating the case.

Other prominent names in the bandwagon include anchors Sudhir Chaudhary and Amish Devgan. 

India is a country where a show of support can make a career and a sharp criticism end one. But there are some journalists, who go about doing their job, regardless of the consequence. But, one thing is for certain that the quality of news coverage in TV has dropped.

With the trust in TV fast disappearing, people are looking at social media platforms for information.

Twitter has taken a big step to earn that trust by adding fact-checking feature. 

According to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, the fact-checking feature is meant to contain the spread of lies and misinformation. "To connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves," Jack had tweeted.

It's first victim was US President Donald Trump, whose tweet was linked with this feature. 

Felt betrayed by the platform he uses the most, Trump launched a tirade of accusations in response. He issued an executive order that threatened to take away the legal protection for social media platforms, censoring 'free speech.'

But Twitter didn't erase or censor the tweet. It placed an icon at the bottom for the users, interested in knowing the truth about the words.

Trump posted the same words on Facebook, but the social media giant left it as it is. Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg thought different. He said private companies shouldn't be the arbiters of truth. 

The idea behind his decision was to keep Facebook out of trouble. Zuckerberg didn't want any confrontation. He wants Facebook to be more permissive in allowing the flow of information regardless of its nature. 

Such decisions do nothing but encourage the perpetrators of falsehoods.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What the CJP won and Amit Shah's gamble

A joke became an identity. An identity became a protest. And a protest, dismissed as an online tantrum, forced one of the most powerful governments in modern India to retreat. That is the short history of the Cockroach Janta Party, or CJP. Born in May 2026 from six sarcastic words posted online, the movement travelled from memes to Jantar Mantar , from ridicule to repression, and finally to a ministerial resignation and promises of systemic reform. In barely ten weeks, it achieved what established opposition parties had often failed to do: it converted diffuse youth anger into a focused political cost. But movements are judged not only by the moment they break through. They are also judged by what they do after the breakthrough. CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke has now demanded the resignation of Union Home Minister Amit Shah over the police action against protesters during the July 20 “ Sansad Chalo ” (“March to Parliament”) rally. Other senior CJP figures have backed holding Shah...
Post a Comment
Read more

The internet built the Modi era. Can it also disrupt it?

The BJP mastered social media to bypass traditional gatekeepers. Now, young Indians are using the same digital space to challenge its narrative and overcome a culture of political fear. The BJP understood the political power of the internet before most of its opponents did. Social media allowed Narendra Modi to reduce his dependence on traditional journalism, speak directly to voters and build a political image that was everywhere at once. Online campaigns did not merely promote the BJP. They helped create the Modi era. But the internet does not remain loyal to those who master it first. When the weapon changes hands Young Indians are now using the same digital space to question authority, ridicule political messaging and turn private frustration into public anger. The Cockroach Janta Party, or CJP, is the latest example. What began as an online satirical response to a judicial remark about unemployed youth soon became a rallying point for anger over unemployment, examination paper lea...
Post a Comment
Read more

When protest becomes content: Who speaks for Jharkhand’s job aspirants?

Social media has drawn national attention to alleged recruitment-exam irregularities in Jharkhand. It has also complicated the question of who represents the affected candidates. Thousands of job aspirants marched towards the Jharkhand Assembly on August 10, turning a state recruitment dispute into a national story. Reuters reported that protesters crossed barricades before police used water cannons, tear gas and batons. Police said some protesters became violent and that only limited force was used. Protesters accused the police of using excessive force. These accounts remain disputed, but the clash marked a sharp escalation in the agitation that began on July 25. Behind the dramatic footage lies a less visible fact: the protest is not led by one unified group. The protesters allege irregularities in examinations conducted by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission and the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission. Their main demands include cancelling the 14th JPSC preliminary examinatio...
Post a Comment
Read more